“At Richetto Chiropractic and Rehab, we adhere to the principles and peer reviewed researches which legitimize proper and reasonable treatments in the healthcare arena. RCR promotes and adheres to both Chiropractic AND Physical Therapy protocols, and believes that when combined, these philosophies are greater than the sum of their parts. In addition, we provide each patient a specific and personal blend of Chiropractic, Physical, and Manual modalities to get each patient symptom free more efficiently and effectively.” Dr. Drew Richetto, DC, CSCS
The immediate effect of Chiropractic manipulation versus Physical Therapy mobilization on pain and range of motion in the cervical spine: a randomized controlled trial.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/1469341?dopt=Abstract&holding=f1000,f1000m,isrctn
The objective of this study was to compare how the patient’s pain and range of motion were affected immediately following a Chiropractic manipulation (CMT) verses Physical Therapy mobilization (“Mobs”) in neck pain patients. 100 patients were studied, suffering from a unilateral neck pain which referred into the trapezius muscle.
52 patients received chiropractic manipulation and 48 subjects were mobilized using Physical Therapy Mobs. 16 subjects reported having neck pain for less than 1 week (acute phase), 34 subjects stated having pain between 1 week and 6 months (subacute to chronic) and 50 patients reported having pain for more than 6 months (chronic). 78 subjects had a prior history of neck pain. 31 subjects had been involved in a motor vehicle accident and 28 subjects had other types of minor trauma to the neck. Using the Pain Disability Index, there were no significant differences measured between the two treatment groups with respect to history of neck pain or level of disability.
The patients received either a single rotational manipulation (high-velocity, low-amplitude thrust) or received mobilization in the form of muscle energy technique. Cervical spine range of motion and pain intensity were recorded Prior to and immediately after the treatments. The results show that both treatments do increase active ranges of motion, however, manipulation had a significantly greater effect on decreasing the subjects’ pain intensity. 85% of the manipulated patients and 69% of the mobilized patients reported pain improvement immediately after treatment. However, the decrease in pain intensity was more than 1.5 times greater in the manipulated group. This study demonstrates that a single manipulation is more effective than mobilization in decreasing pain in patients with mechanical neck pain. Both treatments do increase range of motion in the neck to a similar degree.